There is no point in resisting this approach, especially if competitors set new standards that all other platforms must follow, and they stand to lose a lot. Google will only remove third-party tracking when it determines it can be replaced with something equally effective and profitable. This helps explain why Google has now abandoned plans to deprecate third-party cookies entirely, instead opting for a phased approach that puts consumers in control.
What’s next for cookies? Apple CEO Tim in 2019: "Technology doesn't need to stitch
algeria number dataset together reams of personal data across dozens of websites and apps to be successful. Advertising has existed and thrived for decades without it." Of course, Apple doesn't rely on ad revenue, and one can sense they are enjoying their new role as privacy protectors. In fact, advertisers now know that personal data can drive highly effective marketing campaigns.
They are unlikely to go back to their old ways if they have a choice in the matter. The big question for Google and other ad tech companies like Criteo is: Can they provide cookie-like tracking capabilities while protecting the privacy of individual users? This seems to be an irresolvable paradox. Especially since any short-term solution that doesn't protect privacy will be shut down by regulators. The UK’s data protection agency, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), responded to Google’s latest plans, saying: “We are disappointed that Google has changed its plans and no longer intends to deprecate third-party cookies in Chrome.